tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4147219.post116728105621749555..comments2024-03-11T07:26:04.670-05:00Comments on Posthuman Blues: Machttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11074004681516756703noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4147219.post-42177636592982845542011-11-27T21:52:42.398-06:002011-11-27T21:52:42.398-06:00Really great post, Thank you for sharing This know...Really great post, Thank you for sharing This knowledge.Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same level of content as you, the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up!order viagrahttp://buyviagracheapmedicgeneric.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4147219.post-24683632732089232472010-09-28T11:27:13.408-05:002010-09-28T11:27:13.408-05:00to many lies, to many excuses, and hundred of hidi...to many lies, to many excuses, and hundred of hiding trues, why the government effort top hide something that should be of the public domain.Buy Propeciahttp://www.xlpharmacy.com/propecia/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4147219.post-1167364985507337152006-12-28T22:03:00.000-06:002006-12-28T22:03:00.000-06:00Even if the hypothesis doesn't work out it has pro...<I>Even if the hypothesis doesn't work out it has provided another angle on exmaining the problem and might be slightly closer to "the truth" than previous efforts. It also helps mix things up and shows people they can try thinking along different lines.</I><BR/><BR/>My thoughts exactly.Machttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11074004681516756703noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4147219.post-1167351139390328062006-12-28T18:12:00.000-06:002006-12-28T18:12:00.000-06:00I suppose the problem with the ETH is that the dat...I suppose the problem with the ETH is that the data is so varied and downright weird (with no clear dividing lines between ufology and the weirder edges of cryptozoology and other branches of Forteana) that it is just an inadequate explanation.<BR/><BR/>From what I've seen I'm not 100% convinced that Mac's CTH will be able to explain it all either but then again nothing does (Keel and Vallee are a little to nebulous and really just suggest something very strange is going which is not unreasonable conclusion but doesn't offer any testable hypothesise). The reason I'm looking forward to seeing what Mac comes up with is that it offers a theory that can be tested against the data which is in the end what science is all about - hypothesis testing. Even if the hypothesis doesn't work out it has provided another angle on exmaining the problem and might be slightly closer to "the truth" than previous efforts. It also helps mix things up and shows people they can try thinking along different lines.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4147219.post-1167285076245169712006-12-27T23:51:00.000-06:002006-12-27T23:51:00.000-06:00As long as the ETH remains dogma, we'll see little...<I>As long as the ETH remains dogma, we'll see little or no productive dialogue between the ufological "community" and the scientific mainstream. And while neither side is totally to blame, I feel it's incumbent upon ufology to break the ice. It can start by refamiliarizing itself with scientific methodology and the need to suspend conclusions -- however fetching -- in the face of a genuine unknown.</I><BR/><BR/>BINGO!<BR/><BR/>You're absolutely, 100% correct, that it's up to ufology to move towards science first, and not the other way around - and that will involve, as you suggest, the jettisoning of dogma, and self-satisfied holier-than-thou know-it-all-ism (I just made that one up), and a return to a balanced look at a subject that remains an enigma. It also means a willingness to entertain criticism, even harsh criticism, in the search for the truth.<BR/><BR/>PaulAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com