Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job'
"'It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7," said Reynolds this week from his offices at Texas A&M. 'If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings.'"
Regardless of whether 9/11 was an "inside job," I think it's darkly comic that most Americans don't seem to realize a third building was involved; if nothing else, it's an alarming example of how simple it is for a select few to manage the facts surrounding even a massively public catastrophe.
I think I posted about this before... we all know it, it's just a matter of the WH admitting it, which will never happen.
ReplyDelete...and if well planned, why wouldn't it [they] know the exact floor?
ReplyDeleteaw, come on w.m.bear, jump on...
ReplyDelete:o)
I think there's a case to be made for demolition. But no conspiracy theory can hope to exclude the very real presence of actual airplanes hitting the towers.
ReplyDelete"This is not important anyway as the article implies that there were no planes. That implication completely negates the credibility of the writer."
ReplyDeleteI agree. I'm not writing off the possibility that 9/11 was an engineered "Pearl Harbor," but I don't understand this stuff about phantom planes.
And remember Rumsfeld's Freudian slip when he briefly mentioned shooting down airliners.
ReplyDeleteI am not saying there were no planes, but I do think it was all a set up - and I agree somewhat with a lot of what the andy-christ said.
ReplyDeleteThis whole scenario reminds me of George Orwell's 1984...
ReplyDelete