its funny that you laugh at people who believe in silly religions but refusing to let go of the pile-of-sand-on-mars in the face of all evidence is just as silly of a religion
I have grave doubts the "parrot" is actually a geoglyph.
"Refusing to let go"? You're implying belief, and in this case I believe nothing. Rather, I'm interested (justly, I think) in the process by which researchers and artists conclude that certain formations on Mars deserve continued study.
why don't people just admit that when something on Mars looks vaguely like something we're familar with, it must be that there is a real connection? its so simple.
its funny that you laugh at people who believe in silly religions but refusing to let go of the pile-of-sand-on-mars in the face of all evidence is just as silly of a religion
ReplyDeleteNameless one,
ReplyDeleteI have grave doubts the "parrot" is actually a geoglyph.
"Refusing to let go"? You're implying belief, and in this case I believe nothing. Rather, I'm interested (justly, I think) in the process by which researchers and artists conclude that certain formations on Mars deserve continued study.
look its irrefutable proof that Jackson Pollock was a Martian (or maybe that JP traveled to Mars and supervised a giant earthworks project):
ReplyDeletehttp://www.marstoday.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=18974
why don't people just admit that when something on Mars looks vaguely like something we're familar with, it must be that there is a real connection? its so simple.