Friday, December 15, 2006



Here's another clip of my interview with Paul Kimball. It's a reasonably good introduction to my ideas but by no means exhaustive; it asks more questions than it answers. For instance, I sometimes refer to the cryptoterrestrial presence as an established truth when, of course, it's anything but. The Indigenous Hypothesis (for sheer lack of a better term) is a thought experiment, a speculative paradigm. Is it a true paradigm? I think it might be. If nothing else, I think it sheds much-needed light on some of the overlooked peculiarities of the UFO phenomenon, illuminating the intellectual state of ufology in the process.

(If you happen to slog through the whole clip, take a moment to savor the devastatingly awkward pause that follows my speculation that the CTs are nomadic.)
at

4 comments:

  1. Anonymous11:54 AM

    Wow, that was really very well said. Although I don't know what this says for my sanity, a couple of times while listening to that I said out loud(alone in the apartment), "That fits in exactly with what I've been thinking lately."

    I thought it was interesting that you added in that the ETH and the CTH aren't mutually exclusive as well...another thought process I've been working through lately.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous11:58 AM

    Wow, that was really very well said. Although I don't know what this says for my sanity, a couple of times while listening to that I said out loud(alone in the apartment), "That fits in exactly with what I've been thinking lately."

    I thought it was interesting that you added in that the ETH and the CTH aren't mutually exclusive as well...another thought process I've been working through lately.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mac2:54 PM

    Although I don't know what this says for my sanity, a couple of times while listening to that I said out loud(alone in the apartment), "That fits in exactly with what I've been thinking lately."

    That's a sign of consummate lucidity and above-average intelligence! ;-)

    I thought it was interesting that you added in that the ETH and the CTH aren't mutually exclusive as well...another thought process I've been working through lately.

    It sure opens a can of worms, doesn't it? But a *fun* can of worms.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous4:24 PM

    That's a sign of consummate lucidity and above-average intelligence! ;-)

    Whew. That's good to know. ;-)

    It sure opens a can of worms, doesn't it? But a *fun* can of worms.

    It really does, and, honestly, I've been enjoying thinking about the possibilities. It certainly does make for some situations which actually, seem to make sense of some of the persistent confusing scenarios continually presented.

    Sorry about the double post. Blogger and I aren't getting along today.

    ReplyDelete