Wednesday, October 20, 2004
The Collapse of WTC 1 Began ABOVE the Aircraft Impact Level
Intriguing. I'm still not claiming it was an "inside job" -- but I do think there is a sufficient residue of anomaly to warrant serious questions. And I think this residue is thicker than we like to admit. Because if it's real and leads to disquieting conclusions, how do we cope? We haven't been able to deal realistically with the perceived doings of terrorists. If the 9/11 attacks were, in part, clever theater for the Bush administration's documented wet dream for a "new Pearl Harbor," could we even begin to deal with the fact?
Intriguing. I'm still not claiming it was an "inside job" -- but I do think there is a sufficient residue of anomaly to warrant serious questions. And I think this residue is thicker than we like to admit. Because if it's real and leads to disquieting conclusions, how do we cope? We haven't been able to deal realistically with the perceived doings of terrorists. If the 9/11 attacks were, in part, clever theater for the Bush administration's documented wet dream for a "new Pearl Harbor," could we even begin to deal with the fact?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment