Interestingly, the ESA produced a second synthetic-perspective view of the Face which I managed to miss. This "alternate" Face lacks the conspicuous horn.
This time there's really no argument -- natural or otherwise, it looks spookily face-like.
But which image most accurately reflects the actual Martian surface? Comparison with photos for which the source imagery is publicly available suggests the markedly less-publicized image (above) is a more faithful portrayal.
1 comment:
It's always looked like a face. How many times must that be demonstrated? The question is whether it's natural or artificial.
Post a Comment