Richard Hoagland's Iapetus saga continues . . .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"A stunning survey of the latest evidence for intelligent life on Mars. Mac Tonnies brings a thoughtful, balanced and highly accessible approach to one of the most fascinating enigmas of our time."
--Herbie Brennan, author of Martian Genesis and The Atlantis Enigma
"Tonnies drops all predetermined opinions about Mars, and asks us to do the same."
--Greg Bishop, author of Project Beta
"I highly recommend the book for anyone interested in the search for extra-terrestrial artifacts, and the political intrigues that invariably accompany it."
--David Jinks, author of The Monkey and the Tetrahredron
"Mac Tonnies goes where NASA fears to tread and he goes first class."
--Peter Gersten, former Director of Citizens Against UFO Secrecy
And don't miss...
(Includes my essay "The Ancients Are Watching.")
Join the Posthuman Blues Geographical Matrix!
6 comments:
One definitely can't fault RH for lack of imagination. He tells a beautiful, brilliant story, true or no. I particularly like the idea of Titan as a terraforming experiment. (Actually, if they migrated from Mars, they would have been martiforming it.) Saturn begins to look more and more totally WEIRD! And how's this for an addendum: the Martians who migrated to the Saturnian system also pushed one of Saturn's moons into an orbit so close that tidal forces tore it apart, forming the rings. Motive? Building materials for Iapetus. (The asteroid belt would not yet have existed, since, according to the RH scenario, Planet V had not yet exploded.) I love this stuff! Pure speculation unbound (or not very bound) by strictly empirical considerations.
--WMB
I've been motivated into opening photoshop. These blow-up 'enhancements' need some looking into, so I downloaded the original image from JPL. And I'm doing this only because I don't like the levels they pushed the enlargements to.
Let us know what -- if anything -- you find. I'm intrigued by some of the claims, but the enhancements look highly suspect.
After much searching, I really found the source image they used, not the one I first thought. Why they don't provide reference links to accompany their analysis (for purposes of PEER REVIEW), I'll never know.
I'm actually impressed. Their top image got washed out, whatever they did to it, but the enlargement and rotation is an honest representation. I can't say as much for the one below it, but I'm surprised they missed this, which can be found in the bottom edge of the large, dark crater in the upper right on the PIA06167 image linked above.
Oooh, good find, Sauceruney!
You know, this installment annoyed me more for the mathematical relationships regarding the ordit, size, etc. than for anything else this time. He is quick to attribute such relationships to design, but my experience with mathematically similar dynamically stable periodic systems is that it is not at all unusual for the components to have such relationships as those are more likely to be stable configurations.
Looks like a surprised gibbon.
Post a Comment