"A stunning survey of the latest evidence for intelligent life on Mars. Mac Tonnies brings a thoughtful, balanced and highly accessible approach to one of the most fascinating enigmas of our time."
--Herbie Brennan, author of Martian Genesis and The Atlantis Enigma
"Tonnies drops all predetermined opinions about Mars, and asks us to do the same."
--Greg Bishop, author of Project Beta
"I highly recommend the book for anyone interested in the search for extra-terrestrial artifacts, and the political intrigues that invariably accompany it."
--David Jinks, author of The Monkey and the Tetrahredron
"Mac Tonnies goes where NASA fears to tread and he goes first class."
--Peter Gersten, former Director of Citizens Against UFO Secrecy
And don't miss...
(Includes my essay "The Ancients Are Watching.")
Join the Posthuman Blues Geographical Matrix!
4 comments:
I think the most interesting point in this story is the statement that the objects "could not have been...the Aurora...".
If such a statement reflects reality, it means that the British asked the US, and was told that it could not be the Aurora. The statement did not say that the US confirmed that there is no such thing. There is mention that the US claims that it does not exist, but that's not what the statement says.
Is this smoking gun evidence that the Aurora exists? And if so, would a denial that these objects were in fact aurora craft not be expected?
The clear implication is that the British military believes the Aurora does exist.
If Aurora does exist, many "black triangle" sightings could easily be explained. Of course, the B-2, the F-117, and the SR-71 explain a number of sightings, as well.
But the unusual nature of the Aurora's presumed propulsion system and even more unusual planform would necessarily result in sightings of "UFOs", since that is exactly what they are...even by the US military, who still refuse to identify the Aurora as an actual craft.
It would be really helpful if the military...rather than acting as if there is nothing weird up there, would at least give hints about what they have, so researchers could avoid long hours looking for something extraterrestrial, when it is in fact a terrestrial craft.
I mean, if the British believe Aurora exists, surely whatever enemies we have out there believe it, too. So what's the harm in letting the cat partway out of the bag?
Kyle
UFOreflections.blogspot.com
Real-life X-Files.
*runs away*
Seth sure is a smooth-talker...
I agree with you on stealth blimps being a likely6 explanation for *some* "flying triangle" sightings.
Here's an idea: Maybe the US started making stealth blimps to serve as plausible deniability in case of a mass sighting of FTs. In case FTs made an impressive overflight of a major city in broad daylight, the Pentagon could hold a press conference and explain to all us saps that what we actually saw were secret blimps.
I seriously doubt the media would ask too many questions, even if the flight characteristics were wildly dissimilar.
Post a Comment