Tuesday, March 01, 2005

Invisibility Shields Planned by Engineers

"The researchers' studies show that spherical and cylindrical objects coated with plasmonic shielding material produce very little light scattering. These objects, when hit by the right wavelength of light, were seen to become so small that they were almost invisible."

The UFO connotations here are pretty obvious. The first reaction (to some) is that this new invisibility technique must be derived from back-engineered UFOs -- which is possible. However, I'm betting certain unidentified "spherical and cylindrical" UFOs seen in our skies are perfectly terrestrial, their purpose to condition witnesses to the very shapes that so conveniently lend themselves to plasmonic shielding (a frighteningly effective stealth technology that we're only now hearing about).

In the event of an unintentional sighting, the military could misdirect attention to "flying saucers," which -- as Peter Jennings' show made plainly clear for any remaining doubters -- the mainstream media treats with scorn or, at best, carefully maintained apathy.

This isn't to dismiss actual unknown craft using weird stealth technology. As Budd Hopkins and Carol Rainey document in "Sight Unseen," key aspects of the alien abduction phenomenon (as popularly conceived, at least) rely on the presumed ability of alien craft to render themselves invisible -- or as close to "invisible" as physics allow. Taken to its paranoid extreme, this means we could be under constant surveillance by omnipresent alien craft . . . and never know it.

There's actually a body of reports that suggests that "real" UFOs are using something very much like plasmonics: Close encounter witnesses who recall seeing the interior of alien ships sometimes paradoxically describe the inside of the craft as larger than the craft's exterior.

Could this be due to an external coating of light-absorbing shielding, making the UFO appear significantly smaller than it actually is?

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

What i dont get is how you see the stuff behind the 'cloaked' object? I dont get how reflecting or absorbing light waves allows lightwaves from objects behind the cloaked object to pass through or around? Absorbing light waves just makes an object black doesnt it? I can kind of understand an 'around the object' model but how do you bend light around an object without having a black hole contained somewhere in that object? Did i miss something in the article or does anyone have any ideas? I've often thought about a dynamic 'skin' on objects that transposes an image of the stuff behind the object from the viewers sight lines, so the object is not invisible per se, but it appears to be to anyone looking from any angle.

Anonymous said...

The only way I can think of is to weave the "cloak" out of very fine optical fibers, so that light entering on one side travels through the fibers and emerges from the other at the same angles that it entered. Tough to do probably! And the effect would be something like the Predator's partial invisibility device -- if you look directly at him, you see a moving distortion of the background light.
--WMB

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Mac said...

No, I'm not censoring anyone. Looked like WMB had accidentally posted twice. Just cleaning up.

Anonymous said...

You can project what it would look like in your area if you weren't there, and people would be seeing a projection of what's there, excluding you, and you'd have to do it in real time and could even get the data outside of yourself by using wireless transmissions from something filming the area just behind, in front, to the sides, above and below you. Explaining the simple concept could take a few paragraphs, but I saw a woman in a shirt that was projecting in front of her what the camera on her back was viewing, and you could "see" through her, or what you'd see if she wasn't there, distorted the distance the camera was from the start of the woman.

and black? It doesn't absorb all light... I was told it can't absorb black.

How about that guy Ray that made the Angel Light that makes it possible to see through things, and can make carbon monoxide into oxygen and so on?

Anonymous said...

And if you belive that, I've got a great bridge across the East river to sell you....
--WMB

Dimitar Vesselinov said...

Learning from Extra-terrestrial UFOs – Dark Energy can provide anti-gravity propulsion needed for intergalactic space travel and reaching speed faster than light

"Bangalore is the city of computer scientists. In the middle of hustle and bustle of cyber research and development, a group of engineers and astrophysicist are close to announcing a most major breakthrough in the history of the mankind.

They are working on a concept that can provide cheap source of anti-gravity propulsion though the use “dark energy” – a controversial subject matter in the world of astrophysics. Sources tell us that the secret project is funded by the Indian Space research Organization (ISRO) and DRDO, the defense research establishment in India. We could not confirm the source of the funding and who are really involved in the project.

According to this group of scientists, obtaining anti-gravity propulsion through dark energy is the ultimate goal of any Space research Organization in the world."

http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/1741.asp

Anonymous said...

And if you belive that, I've got a great bridge across the East river to sell you....
--WMB

Anonymous said...

The thing about Ray was posted here, at Posthuman Blues, he has invented a device called the Angel Light that sees through stuff and was on Coast To Coast AM with George Noory and talked about how he put a rat in a tank of Carbon Monoxide and aimed the Angel Light at it and everything was fine. It also kills when there isn't carbon monoxide around - destroying bowls of goldfish immediately and decreasing Ray's health significantly with a few seconds of him inside the beam projected by the light. It destroys any electronic device it's aimed at, compares it to how an EMP disables electronic equipment, and it sees through anything, or atleast tricks the brain to think whatever it's shone on isn't there - or shows whatever would be there had whatever was there not been in the beam.

Mac posted it here a while back, in January, had a link to a newspaper's website. The guy's first name is Ray, his last name is French and starts with an H. He's French Canadian.

But no I don't believe anything except that I believe in no belief. Which balances it out paradoxically.

Anonymous said...

*projected by the device :D

Mac said...

I have big reservations about the "invisibility ray" -- or at least that particular article's treatment of it. I mean, why isn't that guy working black-ops at Area 51 or Kirtland? I'll be very interested in seeing how this one plays out.

Anonymous said...

Just keep him away from my goldfish!
--WMB