Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Redesign Is Seen for Next Craft, NASA Aides Say
"The plan would separate the jobs of hauling people and cargo into orbit and would put the payloads on top of the rockets - as far as possible from the dangers of firing engines and falling debris, which were responsible for the accidents that destroyed the shuttle Challenger in 1986 and the Columbia in 2003.
"By making the rockets from shuttle parts, the new plan would draw on the shuttle's existing network of thousands of contractors and technologies, in theory speeding its completion and lowering its price."
Unfortunately, as Kyle King points out, this "new" design is a disconcerting throwback to Apollo-era technology. And although it might be a workable temporary fix, I'd rather see real progress made toward creating a space elevator.
"The plan would separate the jobs of hauling people and cargo into orbit and would put the payloads on top of the rockets - as far as possible from the dangers of firing engines and falling debris, which were responsible for the accidents that destroyed the shuttle Challenger in 1986 and the Columbia in 2003.
"By making the rockets from shuttle parts, the new plan would draw on the shuttle's existing network of thousands of contractors and technologies, in theory speeding its completion and lowering its price."
Unfortunately, as Kyle King points out, this "new" design is a disconcerting throwback to Apollo-era technology. And although it might be a workable temporary fix, I'd rather see real progress made toward creating a space elevator.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
My main gripe is that it's far, far from reusable, which the shuttle launch system pretended to be.
Mac -
The failure of the tether experiment a few years ago set back the technology a bit. Of course, carbon nanotubes seem to be the ticket now, and some very nice projects have been COMPLETED...including stress-bearing constructs...nanotube "towers", etc.
Someone may try to convince me that a stationary, non-destructive (as in rockets)tower to space is not the ONLY plausible answer to safe, "quick-repeat", reusable, non-polluting
to haul freight and passengers to the cosmos...but he will fail.
The earth already has centrifugal force...a free ride once an object is set at the end of a "string".
The static and other forces created by the movement of the tower through the atmosphere will one day be harnessed to power the entire affair (leading to multi-use elevator installations for low-maintenance power generation).
Truly this is the "Stargate" we can actually build in our liftimes.
Your children may well take their kids to DisneyWorld to ride a brand new ride. Mag-lev UP...Ooo pretty stars...Mag-lev DOWN...thank you, please exit to your right. :)
I can't wait.
Kyle
UFOreflections.blogspot.com
How about if we just stack all the people who don’t care about space exploration on top of each other, and use the resulting pile to climb up in to space?
Post a Comment