Whitley Strieber sounds off again, this time raising some fascinating ideas about what "alien abduction" might be all about.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"A stunning survey of the latest evidence for intelligent life on Mars. Mac Tonnies brings a thoughtful, balanced and highly accessible approach to one of the most fascinating enigmas of our time."
--Herbie Brennan, author of Martian Genesis and The Atlantis Enigma
"Tonnies drops all predetermined opinions about Mars, and asks us to do the same."
--Greg Bishop, author of Project Beta
"I highly recommend the book for anyone interested in the search for extra-terrestrial artifacts, and the political intrigues that invariably accompany it."
--David Jinks, author of The Monkey and the Tetrahredron
"Mac Tonnies goes where NASA fears to tread and he goes first class."
--Peter Gersten, former Director of Citizens Against UFO Secrecy
And don't miss...
(Includes my essay "The Ancients Are Watching.")
Join the Posthuman Blues Geographical Matrix!
10 comments:
_Hair of the Alien_: Some guy wakes up in the middle of the night to find two hot chics in his bedroom. One is a blonde that's sticking her boobs in his face; the other is an Asian hottie who's apparently there to watch them get it on.
Sounds like a pervert's wet dream to me.
Or maybe the Asian hottie was waiting impatiently for her turn to get a piece of the Khoury.
Hey I know, I bet there's a gigantic, intergallactic porn industry out there -- and abductees from different planets (like Earth) are being used in the filming. I can picture it now: A bunch of greys sitting around jerking off while they're watching "Suck Me Like a Black Hole Vol.674"
Sounds like a pervert's wet dream to me.
It very well could be, but I'm willing to give the guy the benefit of the doubt -- for now -- since he apparently has forensic evidence.
Ken,
Responses like yours hardly surprise me, coming as it seems from next to no familiarity with the actual information and case study involved.
Sounds like it might be a big ask for you, but why not check out the detail before you sound of like this.
If you take the trouble to examine the material your next comments may not seem so juvenile,
Regards,
Bill Chalker
http://theozfiles.blogspot.com
Bill,
Hey lighten up; I was only joking. I actually intend on reading your book. ;)
Ken,
All I'm asking for is a serious look at this stuff, and perhaps even support for the approach of a scientific look at such matters, rather than anchoring our perspectives on less documented material.
The material in my book is based on years of research and documentation. It is not superficial knee jerk stuff.
I have documented much of this research in various publications such as the International UFO Reporter back in 1999 and basic info has been available on the web for some time.
However in the book I have covered the Khoury case in greater detail and described two DNA studies of the evidence in depth, along with a whole range of other case material from diverse parts of the world.
With the amount of research, time and money that has gone into this, you may understand my initial reaction to your comments. You are entitled to make them, just as I am entitled to respond to them.
W.M. Bear wrote:
" I'd want to see the hairs and, especially, look at the documented results of the DNA analysis."
You can do this by reading the book. I'm posted a picture of the hair on my blog site.
I do not profess to know what is going on with experiences like Peter Khoury's, but I would argue that we might be more convincing in our speculations if we anchor them in more scientific studies. This is just one case study. I'm about trying to encourage this approach. With more evidence and documentation gathered in this way we can perhaps speculate with more certainty.
Whitley Strieber is entitled to speculate about what this might mean, just as you are. The strengths of the speculative arguments will determine if we want to take them seriously.
"All I'm asking for is a serious look at this stuff, and perhaps even support for the approach of a scientific look at such matters, rather than anchoring our perspectives on less documented material.
The material in my book is based on years of research and documentation. It is not superficial knee jerk stuff."
Understood. I agree with your approach to these matters, and I am very interested in reading your book. Again, my apologies for earlier comments; I meant no offense.
"If it doesn't make you laugh, it isn't true. If it doesn't make you cry, you don't understand it."
Post a Comment