Wednesday, October 10, 2007





You mean Saturn's moon Iapetus isn't a megascale ET artifact?
Posted by at
Labels: ,

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yes, i know!
Cassini had photographed the ridge and it made clear for me that it's natural, with craters and mountains in it!

6:57 PM
Mac said...

Hoagland's "Death Star" proposal was always pretty iffy, but I couldn't help but admire it for its sheer speculative gusto. Of course, we still don't know for *sure* if Iapetus is a wholly natural satellite, but I expect we'll eventually determine it is.

10:02 PM
Anonymous said...

of course the ridge is covered with craters etc... if it's for example million years old artifact, would you still expect it to look like polished chrome? get over it - Solar System is full of artifacts and in fact it is one huge archeological paradise, either it's Mars or Iapetus.
The same with Face on Mars - because it's VERY old it doesn't mean it is natural. Look at the satellite images of the WTC after it collapsed - does that remind you of the tall building?
Iapetus has many unexplained features that simply could not be produced by nature - but all mainstream science has to do to ridicule artificiality claims is to LAUGH and call people like Hoagland "loons", without performing even ONE scientific research...
sad people.

4:28 AM
Anonymous said...

"Follow up observations with spacecraft, like Voyager and Cassini showed that this was because half the moon is covered in snowy white material, while the other half is dark as night."

Talk about your "rocket science." Well, doh....

--W.M. Bear

12:54 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)