Thursday, November 16, 2006
Here's Richard Hoagland's latest. This one's interesting regardless of potential artificiality -- and this early in the game I wouldn't rule out an artificial origin, especially given the interesting "heel" shape of the main anomaly in question; it's one of those features that, if photographed on Earth, would probably arouse at least some interest among archaeologists.
In any case, it's a great deal more compelling than disembodied robot heads.
In any case, it's a great deal more compelling than disembodied robot heads.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I don't see no steenkin' "sculptured former 'gardens,' towers, parapets, etc."
Have I enlarged the grey corner image? Not yet. Shouldn't Hoagland be the one to do that to buttress his claim? Let alone label the aqua and olive colored images, and tell what they are compared to the greyscale one. And maybe tell us a little about why we should take his word that they are titanium.
If what you are assuming is the IR doesn't show the sharper edges, does that mean they are there?
I hope TEM is not going to be referring to that page as a "paper."
Post a Comment