To hell with this "return to the Moon" shit -- let's go to the 'roids!
(Thanks: Steve S.)
"A stunning survey of the latest evidence for intelligent life on Mars. Mac Tonnies brings a thoughtful, balanced and highly accessible approach to one of the most fascinating enigmas of our time."
--Herbie Brennan, author of Martian Genesis and The Atlantis Enigma
"Tonnies drops all predetermined opinions about Mars, and asks us to do the same."
--Greg Bishop, author of Project Beta
"I highly recommend the book for anyone interested in the search for extra-terrestrial artifacts, and the political intrigues that invariably accompany it."
--David Jinks, author of The Monkey and the Tetrahredron
"Mac Tonnies goes where NASA fears to tread and he goes first class."
--Peter Gersten, former Director of Citizens Against UFO Secrecy
And don't miss...
(Includes my essay "The Ancients Are Watching.")
Join the Posthuman Blues Geographical Matrix!
2 comments:
This is what I was talking about here, actually:
http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/2006/10/flying-moon.html
alienview@roadrunner.com
> www.AlienView.net
>> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
>>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com
Yes, I think the article makes some very good points, and that it may be more appropriate to eliminate the proposed "moon base" for now, and first concentrate instead on asteroid visits/landings, as that would serve three purposes more useful than initially having a moon base, which never did seem like a real logical prospect or jumping off point for the future manned Mars mission(s):
1) Landing on asteroids gives us the tools and experience to land on both Mars and Phobos/Diemos sooner than would otherwise be possible if we first try to establish a moon base, which would be horrendously expensive and possibly impractical and/or difficult to supply and sustain, and--
2) Would give us potentially very valuable experience and tech to accomplish asteroid and small moon landings sooner that we would have otherwise, which would not only accelerate our ability to do the Mars planetary mission(s), but also check out some of the rather interesting anomalies on Phobos, for example (the "tower"), and have the added benefit of providing the means and required experience of being able to land on an asteroid, which, considering the very real potential hazards of NEO's, might give us the ability, if one was detected beforehand long enough, to deflect it's potential direction if we calculated one might otherwise cross Earth orbit or hit us. It would be nice to have that deflection capability.
3) Also, it seems mining critical minerals from selected asteroids would be more productive and cost-effective than trying to do similar mining of same valuable materials from the moon.
All in all, seems like a win-win situation, and more important than a having a moon base. If we can accomplish prospects 1 and 2 first, and get to Mars earlier than now scheduled, that would be great, and then we might want to afterward consider establishing a moon base if that seems to still be worthwhile, all variables considered in the financial and timeframe equations involved.
Post a Comment