Tuesday, March 18, 2008





Unknown Country once again attempts to breathe life into the "drone" fiasco . . .
Posted by at
Labels:

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I believe these are bogus, but like the idea of the more abstract design methods. Reinvigorates the whole "inter-dimensionality" prospects.

Instead of always seeing pictures of frisbees and giant black triangles.

Real "aliens" would probably be using types of technology as viewed in this image, not just saucers for 60+ years. And it would all be invisible and cloaked, unless they wanted to be seen.

1:27 AM
Anonymous said...

I can't quite put my finger on it...but the design of the so-called drone is very familiar. I've seen some item that looks very much like it years ago, but as to where and in what context I'm not certain. Wish I could remember. One thing for sure whatever it reminds me of it wasn't a flying machine and the item was quite small.

12:07 PM
Anonymous said...

Old UFO photos never die. These are decent fakes but they do provide several giveaways such as incorrect light sources and a lack of atmospheric haze in relationship to the surrounding area.

2:44 PM
Anonymous said...

yea these are SO BLATANT the balls of the hoaxer(s) on this just blows my mind..its just Mental Ray rendering
I even found the book where they got the method from, posted samples to show people and was completely ignored. They deserve to be fooled.

10:26 AM
Mac said...

The photos are demonstrable fakes. Strieber defends them solely on the perceived credibility of Linda Howe, who claims to have interviewed multiple witnesses.

12:39 AM
Anonymous said...

If Strieber defends the faked CGI photos on the basis of Linda Moulton-Howe's credibility, or rather his perception of it (since she really has no credibility or legitimacy in the UFO field at this point from anyone who knows her history of extraordinary gullibility and confabulation over the past several years), then he's in even worse shape than I thought.

They are disingenuous, delusional, disinformational "birds of a feather," imho. Perhaps they should be nominated for the "Aviary." Sensation and titillation may sell, but it makes for excruciatingly bad research, and makes them dupes.

7:10 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)